Visa application charge
| Charge | Amount |
|---|---|
| Main applicant | AUD $575 |
| Additional applicant 18+ | Nil |
| Additional applicant under 18 | Nil |
Amounts shown are current as at 1 July 2026 and are for general guidance only. The BVB charge is indexed annually on 1 July; check the current charge before lodgement.
Location
| Item | Rule |
|---|---|
| Application lodged | In Australia, not in immigration clearance |
| Visa granted | In Australia, not in immigration clearance |
The applicant must have been immigration cleared and must not be in immigration detention or criminal detention. A person cannot make a valid BVB application if they hold a Subclass 785 or 790 visa, or if their last substantive visa was a Subclass 785 or 790 visa [item 1302(3)(bb)].
Visa held at lodgement
| Situation | Requirement |
|---|---|
| At BVB application | The applicant must hold a Bridging A or Bridging B visa. |
| Underlying application or review | The applicant must fit a qualifying pending or refused substantive visa or Partner visa application pathway. |
| Travel need | The applicant must wish to leave and re-enter Australia during processing or review, and the reasons must be substantial. |
A BVB is not a fallback status visa. It is for eligible BVA/BVB holders who need a travel facility.
Family members
| Item | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Combined application | Family unit members can combine their BVB application with the main applicant's application. |
| Own eligibility | Each applicant must satisfy the BVB criteria in their own right. |
Visa conditions
| Item | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Condition set | BVB conditions are pathway-dependent and may carry through from the BVA or BVB held at application. |
| Work and study | Do not assume work or study rights from the subclass number alone. Check the grant notice and any carried-over conditions. |
| Travel period | Check the BVB grant notice for the travel facility and visa expiry before departure. |
The BVB travel facility does not remove other conditions that apply to the visa.
Frequently asked questions
Q001. What is the difference between a bridging visa being granted and being in effect?
A bridging visa can be granted long before it takes effect. A visa has effect as soon as it is granted unless it provides that it comes into effect on a later day or event [s 68(1)] [s 68(2)], and a bridging visa granted to a person who still holds a substantive visa typically sits dormant until that substantive visa ceases. It is never backdated to the lodgement of the underlying application, so a gap can open between lodging and the bridging visa taking effect.
Work rights, travel, and conditions follow the visa that is actually in effect, not the one merely granted. While a visitor, student, or other substantive visa remains in effect, its conditions control, and the dormant bridging visa's work rights do not activate. The validity of the underlying substantive application is a separate question from the bridging visa's date of effect: a valid application does not bring the date of effect forward.
Q002. What is the role of a Bridging Visa B, and what is the offshore-expiry risk?
A Bridging B is the travel-and-return bridging visa. The applicant must already hold a Bridging A or B [cl 020.211], must have an undecided substantive application (or equivalent linked process), and must satisfy the Minister that the reasons for wishing to leave and re-enter are substantial [cl 020.212]; the return must also not be contrary to the public interest [cl 020.213]. It is not a fallback for a person who cannot meet the Bridging A criteria and not a work-rights device.
The main risk is timing. Do not travel until the Bridging B is granted and its travel period has been checked. If the holder is outside Australia when the travel period passes, the whole bridging visa ceases, not merely the travel facility, and it cannot be revived from offshore [cl 020.511(1)(c)] [s 82(5)]; the recovery is another visa to enter Australia.
Q003. How does a bridging visa holder get the right to work, and why doesn't an employer nomination establish it?
Work rights follow the condition clause of the visa actually in effect. Under the special pathways in cl 010.611(1) to (3E), the Bridging A carries no conditions or specified conditions, but the residual case in cl 010.611(4) carries over the applicable conditions from the visa held at the time of application [cl 010.611]. A Bridging A on the no-work condition 8101 is not varied to permit work; the holder applies for a further Bridging A on a compelling need to work basis, which regulation 1.08 defines exhaustively as financial hardship [reg 1.08(a)] or a narrow Class UC / Subclass 457 nomination limb [reg 1.08(d)] [cl 010.211(4)]. That nomination limb was never extended to Subclass 482, so an approved 482 nomination does not establish the need – the practical route is financial hardship, and the travel-focused Bridging B's grant criteria contain no compelling-need limb at all [cl 020.211]-[cl 020.213].
Need tailored advice on Subclass 020?
If your facts are complex or timing is critical, a registered migration agent can assess eligibility, evidence and lodgement strategy.
Contact Best Visa SolutionsBest Visa Solutions Pty Ltd — Registered Migration Agents: Youbin Zhang (MARN 2519145), Chongxiao Ju (MARN 2518719). This guide provides general information only and does not take account of your individual circumstances. It is not migration advice or legal advice, and reading it does not create an agent–client relationship. Fees and settings are current as at 1 July 2026 and should be checked against the current Department of Home Affairs requirements before lodgement. See our Disclaimer.